論法官的職業(yè)倫理(第一頁(yè))

中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院博士學(xué)位論文
論法官的職業(yè)倫理

內(nèi)容提要
在法治條件下，司法不僅僅是一種公共權(quán)力，它也是一種專門(mén)化的公共事業(yè);法官既是
公共官員，也是以法律為業(yè)的職業(yè)者。作為職業(yè)者，其職業(yè)信譽(yù)和聲望是建立在其專業(yè)權(quán)威
和公共服務(wù)品德的基礎(chǔ)上。本文就是從法律職業(yè)的視角來(lái)研究西方法官職業(yè)倫理的特質(zhì)，以
及其形成、發(fā)展和維持，以及我國(guó)法官職業(yè)倫理的建構(gòu)等問(wèn)題。在本文中，筆者通過(guò)對(duì)西
方法官職業(yè)倫理形成、發(fā)展和維持的分析論證了下列的觀點(diǎn):
西方社會(huì)對(duì)法治的追求而把法官推到了特殊地位，要求其作為一支獨(dú)立的力量獨(dú)立、公
正地執(zhí)掌司法。在法治條件下，旨在確保法官獨(dú)立地位和身份的種種制度安排賦予了法官職
業(yè)共同體獨(dú)立、公正司法所必須的特權(quán)，同時(shí)也責(zé)以他們特別的義務(wù)和責(zé)任。法官享有的特
權(quán)以及其對(duì)社會(huì)承擔(dān)的特殊義務(wù)和責(zé)任使他們具有強(qiáng)烈的職業(yè)榮譽(yù)意識(shí)和道德責(zé)任感，這是
推進(jìn)和推動(dòng)法官職業(yè)共同體不斷加強(qiáng)道德自律，不斷提高自身道德修養(yǎng)，以維持其職業(yè)信譽(yù)
和聲望的內(nèi)在動(dòng)力.因此，筆者認(rèn)為，在司法獨(dú)立作為法治的一個(gè)本質(zhì)要素不可動(dòng)搖的前提
下，要解決司法獨(dú)立與司法廉正的矛盾，任何旨在促進(jìn)司法廉正的制度安排和措施都必須是
有利于強(qiáng)化法官職業(yè)道德自律意識(shí)，通過(guò)激勵(lì)法官職業(yè)共同體的責(zé)任感和危機(jī)意識(shí)，自主加
強(qiáng)職業(yè)自律來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)，外在監(jiān)督和約束必須服務(wù)于內(nèi)在的促進(jìn)和推動(dòng)。本文分以下幾個(gè)部分:
導(dǎo)論。導(dǎo)論簡(jiǎn)要闡述了整個(gè)論文分析的理論框架和主線.
第一章法官的職業(yè)化.法官的職業(yè)倫理與普通行業(yè)的職業(yè)倫理有著本質(zhì)的區(qū)別，這是
法律職業(yè)特點(diǎn)和法官承擔(dān)的特殊職能所決定的。法官作為一個(gè)職業(yè)_是在司法專門(mén)化法
律理性化，法律越來(lái)越成為協(xié)調(diào)多元化價(jià)值和利益的沖突的重要手段時(shí)形成和出現(xiàn)的。多元
化社會(huì)要求法律具有普遍性與連貫性，要求司法具有確定性與一致性，在這樣的條件下，司
法職責(zé)就只能由那些受過(guò)專業(yè)教育和訓(xùn)練的職業(yè)法律家才能勝任，專業(yè)化的專職法官就普遍
取代了非專業(yè)法官，司法也就具有專門(mén)化公共事業(yè)的性質(zhì)，法官逐漸形成為一個(gè)職業(yè)共同體。
雖然，在封建專制統(tǒng)治下，法官作為一個(gè)職業(yè)_，還沒(méi)有完全擺脫封建王室的控制，但他
們的身份獲
……（新文秘網(wǎng)http://120pk.cn省略1492字，正式會(huì)員可完整閱讀）……　
職業(yè)倫理構(gòu)建面臨的主要問(wèn)題。我國(guó)一向重視法官職業(yè)道德的建設(shè)，
而且，在制度的建構(gòu)方面也作了許多努力，但根本的問(wèn)題是:我們還沒(méi)有找到一個(gè)正確的思
路。中國(guó)仍然處在從人治到法治的轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期，我國(guó)目前現(xiàn)行_對(duì)法官的角色定位，以及現(xiàn)
行法官的職業(yè)道德體系還不符合法治的要求。因此，要建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治，必須對(duì)法官的角
色、地位、權(quán)利、義務(wù)與責(zé)任進(jìn)行全新的建構(gòu).本章著重分析了在法治條件下，我國(guó)法官職
業(yè)倫理的構(gòu)建所面臨的幾個(gè)主要矛盾，并揭示了矛盾的焦點(diǎn)還在于法官在法治建設(shè)中的角色
定位問(wèn)題。文章最后提出，只有明確了法官在社會(huì)主義法治中的地位，角色以及相應(yīng)的權(quán)利、
義務(wù)與責(zé)任的特殊性，其他問(wèn)題才能迎刃而解。
關(guān)鍵詞:法官法官的職業(yè)化法官職業(yè)倫理
Abstract
Under rule of law, administration of justice is not only public power, but also
specialized public cause. Judges are both public off cer and legal professionals. As
legal professionals, Judges professional prestige bases on their special authority on
law and their moral quality of public service, This article focus on the professional
spirit and professional moral quality of judges as a legal profession, study and analyze
their formation, development and maintenance of professional spirit and moral quality
of Western judges, and the construction of professional ethics of Chinese judges
Through the analysis of the formation, development and maintenance of professional
ethics of Western judges, this article demonstrates the following views of point:
The pursuit of rule of law by Western society pushs the judges to a special
position, request them to administrate justice independently and impartially as an
independent power. Under rule of law, the measures taken for the sake of securing the
independence of judges entrust them many privileges, meanwhile impose them
special duty and accountability. These畫(huà)vileges, special duty and accountability
breed the strong sense of professional glory and consciousness of professional moral
responsibility. These are the motive power for the professional group to intensify the
self-regulation of professional moral and enhance their moral standards consecutively.
From above analysis I draw the conclusion that when judicial independence as an
essential factor of rule of law must be maintained, any measures taken for the purpose
of solving the conflicts of judicial independence and judicial integrity should
encourage the judges themselves initiativly take proper actions to improve their
professional prestige.
Introduction. Brief the theoretical frame and main thread of analysis and study of
this article.
Chapter I. The professionalization of judges.
essentially differs from that of common vocations,
The professional ethics ofjudges
for judges play special role in the
society of rule of law. In history, following the specialization of administration of
justice, rationalization of law, and with the law playing more and more important role
in coordinating the diverse interests and values, judges formed a professional group.
Pluralistic society require the law have universality and certainty, administration of
justice have certainty and consistence, under this condition, only law e*perts who
were specially trained are competent to be judges. Therefore, professional judges take
place of the non-professional judges, they formed into a profession, administration of
justice also became public cause. From then on, judges gradually got rid of the control
of king, became more and more independent and formed their own professional
ethics.
Chapter II. The tradition of Western judg ……（未完，全文共23296字，當(dāng)前僅顯示4190字，請(qǐng)閱讀下面提示信息。收藏《論法官的職業(yè)倫理(第一頁(yè))》）